• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Phone: 3465 9332

Logo
  • Home
  • Our Team
    • Courtney Barton – Legal Practice Director & Founder
    • George Finn – Executive Director
    • Ellie Prior – Solicitor
    • Tenayah Miano – Paralegal
  • Our Services
    • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
    • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
    • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
    • Child Custody Lawyers
    • Child Support Lawyers
    • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
    • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
    • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
    • Binding Financial Agreements
    • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
    • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
    • Child Adoption Lawyer & Advice
    • Family Court Process
    • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
      • Why Mediate with the Brisbane Family mediator?
      • Contact the Brisbane Family Mediator
      • Barton Family Mediation Costs & Processes
        • Barton Family Mediation Fixed Fees
  • Fixed Fees
  • Common questions
  • Family Law Videos
  • Family Mediation
  • Contact Us
  • Success Stories

What is just and equitable?

January 6, 2020 By Barton Family Law

The court is unable to make an order in relation to the division of property unless it is satisfied that the order is just and equitable: section 79(2) Family Law Act 1975 and section 90SM(3) Family Law Act 1975.

In Mallett & Mallett (1984) 156 CLR 605 and various future cases ending in Hickey & Hickey [2003] FamCA 395, the Court has discussed that the just and equitable requirement is generally considered to be the identifiable fourth step.

What does just and equitable mean?

The words ‘just and equitable’ have been described by Justice Dawson in Mallet & Mallet as being the “overriding requirement” to determine whether it is just and equitable to make AN order at all and what THE order should be, if one is made. In determining whether the order is just and equitable, the court must consider the justice and equity of the outcome, i.e. the actual order itself, not just the underlying percentage (%) distribution of the assets: Russell & Russell [1999] FamCA 1875 and JEL v DDF [2000] FamCA 1353. 

The main purpose of section 79(2) is to ensure that the Court does not alter the property rights of parties unless justice requires it to do so and if the court decides it is just and equitable to make any order, the court is satisfied that the alteration of property goes no further than t he justice of the matter demands.

What are the four steps? just and equitable requirement

Until the case of Stanford,  the four steps considered by the Court in determining what orders it makes, were:

  1. identify the value of the property, liabilities and financial resources of the parties at the date of the hearing;
  2. identify and assess the contributions of the parties and determine the contribution based entitlements of the parties as a percentage of the net value of the property pool;
  3. identify and assess the ‘future needs’ factors under section 79(4) and 75(2) of the Family Law Act so far as they are relevant and determine any adjustment necessary (if any).
  4. consider the effect of those findings and determination as to what order is just and equitable in all the circumstances of the case.

In property disputes, the court’s decision making process involves a broad and independent exercise of discretion, having regard to these four steps, which turns on the facts of each individual matter: Russell & Russell [1999] FamCA 1875. 

The effect of Stanford

The case of Stanford v Stanford [2012[ HCA 52 provided an opportunity for the High Court to provide its views on the proper approach to an application for property adjustment under section 79 of the Family Law Act.

In Stanford, the High Court stated that in any application, the Court must first consider whether it is just and equitable to make an order, rather than considering whether the order is just and equitable as a ‘fourth step’. The case did not approve/disprove the four step process but served to refocus attention on the obligation of the Court not to make an order adjusting property interests unless it was just and equitable to do so and in this regard, there must be a “principled reason for interfering with the existing legal and equitable interests of the parties to the Marriage”: [41].

In Watson & Ling (2013) Justice Murphy confirmed that “As Stanford makes plain (especially at [39]) the breakdown of a marriage (or de facto relationship as defined in the Act) does not bring as an automatic consequence an alteration of existing legal and equitable interests. Just as, if an order is to be made, equality is neither to be assumed nor is a starting point (Mallett v Mallet), so too, the making of an order at all is not to be assumed.” 

Accordingly, the requirement to consider whether an order is just and equitable is now more accurately considered as the first step, making the previous four step process, now five steps.

How is the just and equitable requirement (as a first step) satisfied?

It is clear from Stanford that in many cases the just and equitable requirement, as a first step, is satisfied because once the parties are no longer living together, there will no longer be common use of the property and the express or implied assumptions previously underpinning the parties’ property arrangements will have been brought to an end. This is the situation in the vast majority of cases. The question of whether it is just and equitable to alter the existing property interests in that particular case will be readily answered where both parties are seeking orders which alter their respective property interests. Whether it is just and equitable to make an order is more difficult to answer where one party seeks that no order  be made.

Case Studies dealing with the just and equitable requirement

In Bevan & Bevan [2013] FamCAFC 116 the primary issue in the appeal was whether the trial judge erred in determining that it was just and equitable to alter the existing property interests of the parties when the parties largely lived apart for 18 years and the husband had told the wife she could retain the assets. The appeal was allowed.

In Redman & Redman [2013] FamCAFC 183 the Full Court looked at the just and equitable requirement as a first step. The husband and the wife made an application for consent orders to be made. The sole purpose of the orders sought was to transfer the family home in an intact marriage from the name of the husband to the names of both himself and his wife and to employ the Family Law Act 1975 to achieve this so that stamp duty (very minute in the circumstances) could be avoided. The Registrar declined to make the order. When the decision was appealed, the Court indicated that it does have power under section 79 to make orders in circumstances where the parties marriage is ‘intact’ and had not broken down (Stanford 117 – 118). However, as Stanford says, the court must have a principled reason for interfering with the existing legal and equitable interests of the parties to the marriage. The Court held that there was no reason apparent on the facts and the appeal was dismissed.

Are you unsure as to what order is just and equitable in your case?

If you have recently separated we strongly recommend that you get in contact with one of our experienced family lawyers as soon as possible, for a confidential reduced rate consultation, at which time we can provide you advice in relation to your entitlements and what orders are just and equitable in your case.

Contact us on 3465 9332 to arrange your reduced rate initial consultation today.

Filed Under: News

Barton Family Law

Primary Sidebar

Online Enquiry

I would like to book a reduced rate initial consultation with you

Footer

Areas of Practice

  • Child Custody Lawyers
  • Divorce Property Settlement Lawyers
  • Fixed Fee Divorce Lawyers
  • Domestic Violence Lawyer – DVO Domestic Violence Order
  • Superannuation Splitting & Advice Lawyers
  • Fixed Fee Consent Orders Brisbane
  • Mediation Representation
  • Child Relocation Family Lawyers
  • Child Abduction Family Lawyers
  • Child Support Lawyers
  • Family Law Spousal Maintenance
  • Child Adoption Lawyer & Advice
  • Family Court Process
  • Family Mediation Services Brisbane
  • Binding Financial Agreements

Common Questions & Concerns

  • How to spend more time with your children
  • What is substantial and significant time 
  • Parental Alienation in Family Court Disputes – Pt 1
  • Parental Alienation in Family Court Disputes – Pt 2 
  • Top 10 things people do wrong in child custody matters
  • What age can a child decide where they live?
  • Admissibility of recordings in family law cases 
  • Am I a parent?
  • I’m Not a parent. Can I apply for a parenting order? 
  • I want sole custody
  • Can I go to court without doing mediation first?
  • Can parenting orders be changed? 
  • Relocation of Children
  • Interim relocation of children cases
  • Unilateral relocation of children
  • International travel with children after separation
  • My ex is breaching a parenting order. What do I do? 
  • When is supervised time ordered?
  • Is a child’s changed views enough to change a parenting order? 
  • Interim parenting orders – why can’t the judge make the orders I want? 
  • When can you change your child’s surname?
  • What is substantial & significant time?
  • Domestic violence order applications – boosting prospects of success
  • What to do and what not to do when you separate
  • Why you should formalise your property settlement;
  • Is Domestic violence relevant in a property settlement?
  • 6 secrets revealed to protect your assets 
  • 10 tips to protect your assets
  • 6 things you must know before hiring a family lawyer
  • Your Duty of Disclosure 
  • Spousal Maintenance – supporting your ex partner after separation 
  • Initial contribution of assets in a long relationship 
  • What is the just and equitable requirement?
  • Chancellor & Mccoy – no order after 27 yr relationship
  • Am I in a de facto relationship?
  • My ex is selling assets. What can I do?
  • Property acquired after separation – how is it treated? 
  • When are future inheritances they taken into account?
  • Failure to disclose an asset can derail consent orders 
  • Consequences of Defaulting on property orders 
  • Varying property orders 
  • Who stays in the home after separation?
  • Can the court order someone to leave the house – ouster orders 
  • Money lent from parents – gift or loan?
  • The impact of centrelink fraud on a property settlement 
  • CGT rollover relief for transfers of property pursuant to family court orders 
  • Costs orders 
  • Divorce – what you need to know
  • Going back to work after divorce 
  • Step-Parent awarded interim custody over parent 

If you are a law student, graduate or early career lawyer, reach out to Courtney who is also a law Coach. Courtney’s law coaching services are invaluable to young lawyers. Courtney’s one on one law coaching services will help you to achieve massive success in your legal career.  Check out Courtney’s website for the Thriving Young Lawyer to learn more about Courtney’s law coaching services.

Individual liability limited by a scheme approved under professional standards legislation.

Contact Us

Head office

  • Address: 4/996 Anzac Avenue, Petrie QLD 4501
  • Parking: Underground parking available at the back of the building via O’Loan Street
  • Phone: 3465 9332
  • Email: george.finn@bartonfamilylaw.com.au
  • Website: Petrie Family Lawyers

Northside – Chermside Office

  • Address: 822 Gympie Road, Chermside QLD 4032
  • Phone: 3465 9332
  • Email: george.finn@bartonfamilylaw.com.au
  • Website: Chermside Family Lawyers

Aspley Office

  • Address: Aspley Hypermarket, 59 Albany Creek Road, Aspley QLD 4034
  • Phone: 3465 9332
  • Email: tenayah.miano@bartonfamilylaw.com.au
  • Website: Aspley Family Lawyers

Toowong Office

  • Address: Toowong Tower Level 5, Toowong Tower, 9 Sherwood Road, Toowong, QLD 4066
  • Phone: 3465 9332
  • Email: tenayah.miano@bartonfamilylaw.com.au
  • Website: Toowong Family Lawyers

Copyright © 2020 · Privacy Policy
Created and hosted by LEAP · Log in